Europe’s crypto industry has shifted from preparing for MiCA to operating under it, with the EU-wide transitional period ending on July 1, 2026.
After the deadline, firms not having obtained MiCA authorization were no longer able to provide crypto asset services in the region.
ESMA said in June that unauthorized providers would have to stop onboarding new EU clients, opening new accounts, and marketing or soliciting their services after the transition ended. In addition, remaining activity had to be limited to an orderly wind-down, including selling or transferring client assets and closing positions.
Since then, digital asset businesses that got MiCA’s approval have already made several changes to how they structure their European businesses, serve customers, and decide which crypto assets remain available.
Authorization Became A Structural Decision
The clearest change has been in how MiCA has created or restructured regulated European entities.
A platform like Coinbase, for example, received its approval from Luxembourg’s financial regulator and moved its European crypto asset services into Coinbase Luxembourg.
The exchange then rolled out the new structure across the European Economic Area, updating customer agreements and informing users that the local entity would provide crypto services rather than Coinbase Europe.
In line with this, Coinbase’s customers had to accept new agreements, while open orders and some recurring trading arrangements were affected by the transition to the new legal structure. The company also retained a separate Irish entity for its e-money services.
Kraken took a similar route through Ireland, with the country’s Central Bank granting it its licence in June 2025, giving it the ability to provide regulated crypto services across the EEA. By August, Kraken said its MiCA-regulated Irish entity was serving customers in all 30 EEA countries.
This approach allowed both exchanges to consolidate their European operations around authorized entities, which also prevented them from having separate national structures for each market.
Binance, which did not secure a MiCA licence, withdrew its application in Greece shortly before the end of the deadline and later told its European customers it would stop providing services from July 1. Still, the exchange has said that it plans to pursue authorization through France.
For these global exchanges, the choice was therefore not between being regulated and carrying on unchanged. The alternatives were to restructure around an approved European entity or completely restrict its customers’ access in the region.
MiCA Rules Forced A Product Shift
MiCA has also affected what crypto companies offer their customers, with platforms like Coinbase beginning to restrict services for several stablecoins that did not meet its requirements for European retail customers as early as December 2024. The affected assets included USDT, PAX, PYUSD, GUSD, GYEN and DAI, while USDC and EURC remained supported because of compliance.
The exchange later provided conversion routes for some affected digital assets, including USDT and DAI, allowing the bloc’s customers to move into supported assets instead of leaving them with balances that could no longer be traded in the same way.
Circle, meanwhile, adapted its stablecoin operation to the regulatory framework. The firm became the first major global stablecoin issuer to achieve compliance under MiCA’s stablecoin regime, with USDC and EURC issued under its French electronic money institution. Circle said the move took effect in July 2024, before the wider CASP licensing requirements came into force.
Its EURC documentation identifies Circle SAS as the issuer, and lists regulated European platforms like Coinbase, Bitstamp, Bitvavo and Kraken among those supporting the token.
Notably, Coinbase adapted its exchange offering by restricting access to assets that did not meet the regulatory requirements, while its counterparty changed the issuing structure of its own stablecoins so that they could continue to be distributed through regulated European channels.
Research published in 2026 also found that exchanges subject to MiCA moved toward USDC, with its market share rising by 0.82% as USDT trading reduced following European delistings.
Compliance Is Now Influencing Market Access
The implementation of MiCA changed how corporate and institutional clients choose crypto providers in Europe, with the entities now required to assess their regulatory structure on top of fees, liquidity and technology.
A bank, fintech or corporate treasury using an exchange or custodian would therefore need to know which legal entity provides the service, where it is authorized and whether the permission covers the activity it intends to use.
MiCA also places obligations around client asset protection, governance, conflicts of interest, complaints handling, record keeping, operational resilience and market abuse controls, which determine how a regulated provider builds its internal systems and manages the risks associated with holding and transferring crypto assets.
Meanwhile, ESMA’s supervision is now moving deeper into these systems. In July 2026, the regulator launched a Common Supervisory Action on digital operational resilience at crypto asset service providers, with a focus on custody. The review covers DLT risks, governance, key and storage management, transaction controls, incident response, smart contract risks and third-party dependencies.
That means a MiCA licence is not the end of the regulatory process, with approved firms now operating under continuing supervision of the systems that support their crypto services.
Essentially, staying compliant requires crypto businesses to move customers between legal entities, change their product offerings, redesign operational systems, switch counterparties and, in some cases, exit a market altogether.
This makes MiCA a commercial decision that determines where a crypto company can operate, which products it can offer and the assets that can remain available to European clients.
About The Author
