Rethinking Bitcoin Cycles: The Centrality of Demand Over Price
The conventional wisdom often ties Bitcoin’s cyclical patterns directly to its price performance. However, a compelling alternative perspective, put forth by Julio Moreno, Head of Research at on-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant, argues that the true driver of Bitcoin cycles is underlying demand, not merely its fluctuating market value.
“Most are focusing on price performance to define a cycle, when it is demand what they should be looking to,” Moreno asserts.
Unpacking the Apparent Demand Indicator
To quantify this crucial demand, CryptoQuant utilizes its proprietary “Apparent Demand” indicator. This metric offers a unique lens into the cryptocurrency’s market dynamics by comparing its daily production against shifts in its long-term holdings.
- Miner Issuance: This component represents the daily “production” of Bitcoin, reflecting the amount of new BTC minted by miners as block rewards.
- 1-Year Dormant Supply: Considered the asset’s “inventory,” this tracks changes in the supply of Bitcoin that has remained inactive for at least one year.
In essence, Apparent Demand evaluates whether the market is absorbing newly produced Bitcoin and drawing from existing long-term holdings, or if accumulation is slowing relative to new supply.
Historical Precedent: Apparent Demand as a Cycle Bellwether
Analysis of past Bitcoin cycles reveals a striking correlation: major market transitions into bear phases have historically occurred when the Apparent Demand indicator, across both 30-day and 1-year timeframes, dipped into negative territory. This suggests a systemic breakdown in demand relative to supply, preceding significant price corrections.
Current Market Dynamics: A Signal of Caution?
In the present cycle, the Apparent Demand indicator presents a nuanced picture:
- 30-Day Apparent Demand: This short-term measure has recently entered the negative zone, indicating a contraction in monthly demand for Bitcoin.
- 1-Year Apparent Demand: While still positive, the longer-term indicator has been on a noticeable downtrend. Should this trajectory persist, it would inevitably cross into negative territory.
Given the historical patterns, the current configuration of the Apparent Demand indicator points towards a potentially bearish outlook. The critical juncture lies in whether the yearly metric will follow its shorter-term counterpart into the red, or if a resurgence in demand will lead to a rebound.
Beyond Spot Markets: The Role of ETF Demand
The landscape of Bitcoin demand has expanded significantly with the introduction of spot Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs). These financial products have opened new avenues for institutional and retail capital to enter the cryptocurrency market, creating a distinct “off-chain” demand component.
However, recent data from on-chain analytics firm Glassnode suggests that this new stream of demand has also experienced a slowdown. The 30-day net flow for US spot BTC ETFs has remained consistently negative, signaling a muted appetite from this critical segment of the market.
Conclusion: Demand’s Enduring Influence on Bitcoin’s Trajectory
The insights from CryptoQuant and Glassnode underscore a pivotal shift in how market participants should interpret Bitcoin’s cyclical nature. While price movements capture immediate attention, it is the underlying ebb and flow of demand—both on-chain and through new vehicles like ETFs—that ultimately dictates the asset’s long-term trajectory.
As Bitcoin currently consolidates around the $88,000 mark, careful monitoring of metrics like Apparent Demand and ETF net flows becomes paramount. These indicators offer a more profound understanding of market health, moving beyond superficial price analysis to reveal the fundamental forces shaping the future of digital assets.
About The Author
